The question is not whether migration is “good” or “bad” — it’s how it’s managed, writes Professor Alan Gamlen…
Migration is one of the defining forces of the 21st century. It changes economies, societies, families and individual lives. Yet public debate often reduces it to a deceptively simple question, one which drives division and anger: are you for migration or against it?
That is the wrong question.
Human beings have always moved. They move for work, family, education, safety, adventure and a better life. Sometimes they move once and settle permanently. Often they move several times, maintain connections across borders, or eventually return home.
Migration is rarely just an individual calculation about wages. Families and communities shape decisions. Social networks make some destinations easier to reach than others.
Recruiters, universities and employers actively encourage mobility. Historical ties, languages, trade relationships and colonial legacies create migration pathways that can persist for generations.
And beneath all these explanations lies something more basic: human beings have always sought movement, opportunity and change.
Migration transforms lives
For many migrants, moving dramatically improves living standards.
Crossing from a poor country to a wealthy one can multiply earnings several times over. Migration can also provide access to safer communities, better education, healthcare and political freedoms.
But migration can create serious vulnerabilities too.
Once people cross borders, responsibility for protecting them becomes blurred. Migrants can become vulnerable to exploitative employers, dishonest recruitment agents, smugglers and traffickers. Temporary workers are especially exposed when their visa status depends heavily on a particular employer.
Migration also affects the places people leave behind.
Emigration can deprive poorer countries of skilled doctors, nurses, engineers and other professionals. Rural areas may lose population. Families can spend years separated.
But migrants also send money, knowledge and investment home. Remittances have become one of the largest financial flows into many developing countries, often exceeding both foreign aid and foreign investment. Diasporas can create trade links, businesses, professional networks and opportunities that span borders.
Migration therefore creates risks and rewards on both sides of the journey.
Please consider supporting The Klaxon here
The Klaxon’s report Friday. Read our full series on “The Age of Rage” here.
What migrants bring
Migrants into Australia experience the same mixture.
They expand the labour force, start businesses and introduce new ideas. Skilled migrants can increase innovation. Other migrants fill jobs that employers struggle to recruit locally.
They also change culture. Australian food, sport, music, neighbourhoods and workplaces are inseparable from successive waves of migration.
More than half of Australians were either born overseas or have at least one overseas-born parent. Migration is not something happening outside Australian society. It is part of what Australian society is.
“More than half of Australians were either born overseas or have at least one overseas-born parent”
But rapid migration can also create pressures.
Population growth increases demand for housing, transport, schools and healthcare. Poorly designed temporary migration programmes can encourage exploitation.
Employers want workers but get human beings, with families and connections who change communities. And rapid social change can provoke anxiety and anger.
These pressures need to be acknowledged rather than dismissed.
“Rapid social change can provoke anxiety and anger”
The mistake is to leap from recognising them to assuming migrants caused every problem associated with population growth.
Housing shortages, for example, depend heavily on construction, land supply, planning, infrastructure and investment.
Labour-market outcomes depend on wages, regulation and enforcement. Social cohesion depends on whether governments and communities help newcomers participate in shared institutions.
Migration interacts with these systems. It does not replace them as an explanation.
A “March for Australia” anti-immigration rally in Melbourne on Sunday, August 30. Picture: Jay Kogler/SOPA Images
Most migration is not what people imagine
Public discussion also gives a misleading picture of who migrants are.
Global migration remains relatively unusual. Only a small share of the world’s population lives outside the country where they were born.
Most international migrants are not refugees. Most move through ordinary pathways for work, family, education or lifestyle reasons.
Forced displacement is nevertheless a severe and growing global problem. Wars and political instability have displaced tens of millions of people, while climate change is creating new forms of displacement that existing refugee law was never designed to handle.
“Climate change is creating new forms of displacement”
Australia’s migration system reflects this diversity.
It has a relatively small, capped permanent migration programme and humanitarian programme, alongside much larger temporary flows involving students, skilled workers, working holiday-makers and others.
That distinction matters. Talking about “migration” as though it were a single programme obscures more than it reveals.
What good migration policy looks like
Migration is not a crisis to be stopped, nor a magic solution to every economic problem.
It is a permanent feature of an interconnected world that has to be governed competently.
Good migration policy starts with accurate information. Governments need clear data about who is arriving, who is leaving, why they are moving and what happens afterwards.
“Good migration policy starts with accurate information”
Rules should be understandable and enforceable. Labour migrants need protection from exploitation. Overseas qualifications should be recognised efficiently. Temporary programmes should have credible pathways for departure, return or transition where appropriate.
Countries also need to coordinate migration policy so as to be in step with housing, infrastructure, education and labour-market policy. Inviting people to come without preparing for population growth merely transfers the costs of policy failure onto migrants and existing residents alike.
And migration management cannot stop at the border. Countries of destination, origin and transit are linked through migration systems, so cooperation matters.
The objective is therefore neither completely open nor completely closed borders.
It requires safe, orderly and regular movement, governed by institutions capable of balancing individual freedom with economic needs and social cohesion.
Migration can transform lives and enrich societies. It can also generate genuine pressures and vulnerabilities.
The sensible political question is not whether migration is good or bad.
It is whether we are managing it well.
Alan Gamlen is professor and director of the Migration Hub at the Australian National University (ANU)
Quality independent journalism is vital to our democracy. Please consider supporting us for as little as $10 a month, or by making a one-off donation of any amount here.
Thank you,
Anthony Klan
Editor, The Klaxon
